Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    • CommentAuthorDetroitMan
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2009
     permalink
    Personally I don't think this project will go through. Given the fact that most of the other mixed-use and residential projects in the area are on hold because of the economy. Plus I don't think the Lansing area could support a third "downtown".

    $85M development planned near Eastwood
    Midday update

    Melissa Domsic • mdomsic@lsj.com • October 20, 2009 • From LSJ.com

    LANSING TWP. - Vacant land surrounding Eastwood Towne Center could see an influx of activity with a handful of new restaurants, shops, condos, a boutique hotel and a parking ramp.

    Plans are in the works for an $85 million, 15-acre mixed-use development on Preyde Boulevard east of NCG Eastwood Cinemas and north of Champps Restaurant and Bar.

    The Lansing Township Downtown Development Authority hopes to receive $29 million in federal Recovery Zone Bonds and start construction next spring.

    The DDA would build the parking deck and some commercial space, while private developers would construct the rest.

    For more on this story, read Wednesday's Lansing State Journal.
    http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20091020/NEWS03/310200018
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2009
     permalink
    I've been expecting to hearsome official word on a new Eastwood development for awhile. I'm fairly confident that this project will happen, even if it may be awhile before we see it get underway.
    • CommentAuthormicro
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2009 edited
     permalink
    I'm with DetroitMan as far as having concerns if Mid-Michigan can support this. Put another way, will the success of this development come at the detriment to another area, be it downtown Lansing, Old Town, Downtown East Lansing, etc.? For example, the money itself (the $29 million) that's needed to even get this started, as far as I understand, is in direct competition with a parking ramp downtown Lansing wants to build. So right from the beginning, this would take away something from downtown. I don't see this development as adding to the urban environment of Mid-Michigan so I'm not sure I can support it. It just seems to be tearing down forest to build something rather than building on empty space in already existing downtowns in the area. But I've been wrong before. Maybe some of you other guys have a different perspective on how this could play out and actually be a benefit overall??? I'd love to hear it!

    I was particularly impressed with the maturity and wisdom of the Dewitt town supervisor who was quoted in the LSJ after Auto Owner's announced they're expanding their current HQ instead of moving it to Dewitt. His comment was along the lines of 'I'm sad they're not coming, but Dewitt's success was never dependent on them coming here, and we're thrilled they're staying in Lansing and expanding...what's good for the area is good for us all." Too bad Lansing and Lansing Township can't get on board with that mentality. As of late is also seems Lansing/E. Lanisng relations have been good and focused on the collective improvement of the area also.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2009
     permalink
    I don't think this development will have much of an affect on any of our urban centers. It will probably have much more of an impact on the malls and the suburban retail corridors.
    • CommentAuthorMichMatters
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009 edited
     permalink
    I'm surprised the LSJ published this, especially as if they hadn't just mentioned it a few days and weeks ago. This is so obviously propoganda, as they are wrangling for the same stimulus bonds as the Accident Fund parking garage, downtown. The paper literally mentioned this a few days ago, and I believe just on Sunday they used their editorial to come out in support of granting the Accident Fund parking garage project bond priority over this speculative parking garage/retail combo at Eastwood.

    Either Melissa Domsic didn't do her homework or her editors know exactly what they were doing, or both. I don't know who they think they are trying to fool.
    • CommentAuthorDetroitMan
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009
     permalink
    After reading this article in today's edition, I'm more convinced than ever this project shouldn't be built.

    $85 million plan puts shops, hotel near Eastwood
    Lansing Township proposes new development adding restaurants, condos and a parking ramp

    Melissa Domsic • mdomsic@lsj.com • October 21, 2009 • From Lansing State Journal

    LANSING TWP. - An $85 million development plan adjacent to Eastwood Town Center is poised to bring more diners and shoppers to the area near Lake Lansing Road and U.S. 127.

    Plans are in the works for a 15-acre mixed-use development on vacant land along Preyde Boulevard east of NCG Eastwood Cinemas and north of the Champps Americana restaurant. Those plans call for a collection of restaurants, shops, condos, a boutique hotel and a parking ramp.

    The Lansing Township Downtown Development Authority hopes to receive $29 million in Recovery Zone Bonds - federal stimulus package money - and start construction in spring 2010.

    The DDA would build the parking structure and some commercial space at a cost of roughly $21 million to $25 million, but it's seeking a private developer for the rest of the project.

    The DDA's portion would be funded partly through a special assessment levied on the existing and future commercial properties that would use the parking structure.

    "The DDA's role is to encourage economic development at a level above what the private market would support," Executive Director Steve Hayward said.
    New jobs

    Altogether, the development should create 200 to 300 jobs, Hayward said. But at least one retail expert questioned the wisdom of embarking on such an ambitious plan now.

    Pat Huddleston, retailing professor at Michigan State University, said she's surprised the DDA is planning an expansion in the midst of a recession.

    On the other hand, she said, this could be a good opportunity to lock in lower construction costs.

    "I'm not sure that it's needed, but it's possible that it could be viable if they bring in retailing and dining options that aren't already present in the Lansing area," Huddleston said.

    Eastwood Towne Center opened in September 2002 at Lake Lansing Road just west of U.S. 127. It's 95 percent occupied and is made up of about 40 stores, several restaurants and a movie theater. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and its Sam's Club subsidiary opened stores west of the center in August 2004.
    (2 of 2)

    The planned expansion is not affiliated with Eastwood, which is owned by Inland US Management LLC.

    Multi-use space

    The DDA's plans call for more than 100,000 square feet of mixed-use commercial space and a 926- to 1,285-space parking structure that would span both sides of Preyde Boulevard. Two 12- to 15-story towers would be constructed on top of the parking deck.

    One tower would house a boutique hotel, residential rental units, owner-occupied condominiums and penthouses. The other would hold 140,000 to 200,000 square feet of office space.

    The the rest of the article can be found here:
    http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20091021/NEWS01/910210324
    • CommentAuthorjwswrites
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009
     permalink
    It's nice to actually have the details of what Lansing Township is planning, so thanks to the LSJ for doing this story. All we knew a few days ago was that the township had a plan for a parking ramp that was competing for financing with the Accident Fund/Christman ramp.

    Of course, with no signed tenants in hand (only "verbal commitments," which are worthless) I wouldn't expect to see much more than parking ramp built there for a little while. Of course, the township DDA may have the finances and will to build the ramp and wait for the private development (hotel, retail space, etc.) to come in a few years once the credit markets finally thaw. Given the development across 127 in East Lansing, I have no doubt that Eastwood will eventually build out (let's all hope they do it in the best way, building up and not just sprawling out).

    Here's a question for the group: Would someone really want to live in a condo here? A) You'd be along the interstate, and B) The scent of the landfill (methane) does pretty frequently waft over to Eastwood. Does the convenience of being next to the movie theater and shopping center trump those negatives? I could totally see a hotel - maybe even some apartments - but I'm not sure about condos.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009
     permalink
    I'm not too sure about condos either, I would imagine that this development would be better for student oriented housing and some middle to high end apartments. It's hard to say how well the residential portion of this project will go, although I'm sure that the retail, restraunt, and hotel portions of the project should be quite successfull.
    • CommentAuthorlancity
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009
     permalink
    Its intriguing in that they have the land to build this development, but from the picture presented in the press they haven't even designed it. They want to use federal stimulus bonds but I thought those were for "shovel ready" projects. Perhaps I'm mistaken. I'm about as anti-sprawl as they come and I'd rather see this money spent in a real downtown first, whether it be Lansing, East Lansing, Frandor, Williamston, or any other "historical" urban area.
  1.  permalink
    While I'd love to see this focus and money go to the downtown core, I am cautiously optimistic about this. I always wished that they put in a floor or two of condos and apartments over the retail in Eastwood. If anyone here is familiar with Crocker Park in Cleveland, something a bit like that. I feel like this might build up the area a little more, so it's less sprawl and more multi-layered, if that makes any sense. While I think the downtown should be the focus, I do think that we shouldn't ignore the fringe areas. Eastwood is an important retail area and the anchor of the northern tier and I don't think we should throw all our energy into downtown at the expense of other areas. I think chain restaurants and the type of retail this project will attract is better suited to urbanized suburbs anyway. I don't think any of us expects a Cheesecake Factory to go into downtown, but something like that would really do great at Eastwood. I agree with hood though - I imagine they will end up renting most units to students and young professionals. I doubt a lot of people will buy condos there - except to rent them out.
    • CommentAuthormicro
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009 edited
     permalink
    As far as shovel ready, the parking ramp would be, they'd start that early 2010 and that's what the majority if not all of the stimulus bonds are for. If they do build a parking ramp (as opposed to massive parking lots), and two 12-15 story towers, I'd be more open to it. Because in that case, it would be more urban than a traditional suburban mall. In fact, it wouldn't be terrible to have a nice area with a couple towers and a parking ramp to see as you're coming down 127 to be a signal that you're getting close to a large city. It would become something kinda like Clayton, MO is to St. Louis.

    And along the lines of what woodsstephene said, I myself hate suburbs, I don't like to visit them and I do everything I can to not spend my money there. HOWEVER, I'm a pragmatist and for downtown to do well long-term and to reach it's full potential, I do think we need good suburbs (Okemos, Delta Township, etc.). I think you need them because to attract large companies to move to Lansing, I think you need to offer a wide range of amenties. If we have a thriving downtown urban area and strong suburbs, then a large company with lots of diverse employees will be more open to coming here because their staff can have more choices of where to live. And the reality is some people just prefer suburbs, they don't like cities. So in that respect I do support suburbs to a certain extent (up to the point they detract from the city). Now that I've thought about it more and listened to others, I think Hood had a good point, the concern is more for the impact to other malls/suburb retail areas. So as long as Eastwood doesn't go forward with a convention center project that would detract from the Lansing Center, I don't see this as much of an afront to Lansing. There's more of an impact to Lansing and Meridian Malls and maybe Frandor.
    • CommentAuthorMichMatters
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2009 edited
     permalink
    Again, to be clear, the only thing imminently planned, at the moment, is one level of parking above some speculative retail/commercial space. The township is seeking practically ALL of Ingham County's alloted stimulus bonds to build this. The rest of the plan is completely speculative, which the township supervisor even alludes to in the article that ran in the Journal, today.

    Again, this story was released purely to try and out-wrangle Accident Fund for the available stimulus bonds. The county has a total of $29 million to dole out. The township is seeking $21 to $25 million of those for Eastwood's parking garage, and Accident Fund is seeking $16.2 million for its project for its parking garage. They decided to release the speculative plans, today, to make a stronger case for their bid, but I don't buy it.

    What should happen is that Accident Fund is granted the $16.2 million it needs to help it with its parking garage, and the rest could go to Lansing Township, and force them to come up with the rest of the money they need for their speculative project. This is yet another example of a township wanting to be treated on equal funding as an incorporated city. They want to have their cake and eat it to. They know that as a township they can only raise a fraction in taxes what a city can. Well, boo-effin-hoo. Incorporate, then, and maybe you'll have the more of your own money to put towards these boondoggles.

    Everyone seems to be stuck on debating the possible planning merits of the plan when the real issue, here, and other meta issues, which isn't a bad thing, but this is really another example of a township wanting to have the best of both worlds: wanting city-level amenities without incorporating.

    The Eyde's are rich, right? If Lansing Township and corporation really believes in the merits of this project, they'll do what Lansing did with Accident Fund's request for a garage: ask them to front half the money for the parking ramp and bond the rest of it out.
    • CommentAuthorjwswrites
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2009
     permalink
    You can't exactly say Accident Fund and Christman aren't well off. Both are successful companies, and AF certainly has significant pools of money behind it being an insurance company. I don't mean to be rude but - if you follow the argument MichMatters just put forward - if the township should be expected to finance its own parking garage, then Christman/AF should too.

    Of course, that's just not realistic. Rarely do developers of any kind simply break out cash to do a project. They need investors and lenders to provide credit. I think the conversation on this site shows there's a pretty good business case for both of these projects to move forward. But they need the friggin' banks to come out of their shells and do actually do business. Since the banks are unwilling or unable to finance these good projects, now we have to look to the government for help.

    Micro is right. We need good suburbs and we need a strong, vibrant downtown. They're not mutually exclusive.

    All that said, to me, clearly the Accident Fund project is the more significant and rises to the top for funding. If Lansing Township had a list of signed businesses ready to move in and create lots of jobs, I might think differently. AF has pledged to create hundreds of new jobs, and this project is giving Lansing the much-needed boost to remake the riverfront. I hope the township gets funding for its project too (because, as a number of folks here noted, it's a good plan), but in the grand scheme of things, the AF/Christman garage has to have priority.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2009
     permalink
    Has anyone heard when they will announce which project(s) are getting the bond money?
  2.  permalink
    jwswrites,

    You obviously misread me and completely missed my point. I never even implied that Accident Fund isn't a wealthy company. In fact, that's exactly what I argued: that they are putting their money where their mouth is by not only undertaking the multi-million dollar reconstruction of the Ottawa Street Station and construction of an expensive new annex, but also willing to put up half the cost of building a parking garage. Given that fact then, if the township truly believes the project to be worthwhile -- and they don't have the funds for a parking garage -- they'd be begging the Eyde's to front some of the cost.

    Even if you disagree with that, what we both agree on is the most important point in all of this: Accident Fund's garage should have priority, period, for the sole fact that it's supporting a project already underway. I guess that does tie back into my gripe, though: If Lansing Township believes in their speculative project (especially aruging that it should somehow get priority over a spectacular project already underway), let them and the Eyde's find a way for it; we don't need to be, nor should we be, subsidizing it. It may be different if they had some large anchor tenants committed, but I'd still give priority to the city center when it comes down to a contest between the two.
    • CommentAuthormicro
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2009
     permalink
    Like I said before, if there was some way to know for sure that they'd build a MULTI-level parking garage and two 12-15 story towers and had an anchor tenent or two, I would be very much more in support of this project. So in that sense I agree with jwswrites. But currently all that is actually proposed is a one-level parking ramp and that's hard for me to get behind funding as a taxpayer on that alone. Add to that the fact that is in direct competition to the AF multi-level ramp that's part of the most significant project in the entire region in my opinion and I really can't support a one-level ramp by itself. So in that sense I also agree with MM. I do think suburbs are important for longterm MAJOR growth (as much as I don't like them), but if I have to choose between two projects, I always go with city center. My reason is simple, there are a million cookie cutter nice suburbs, but there are far fewer urban city centers out there to live in. So the city center (along with E. Lansing's college town vibe) is what makes mid-michigan stand-out from all those suburb options and therefore that's where we should be focusing our projects. However, as I said, to truly compete for all major businesses to have a larger pool of potential companies, some of which just aren't going to want to completely leave the suburb lifestyle, we do need good suburbs.
    • CommentAuthormicro
    • CommentTimeOct 24th 2009
     permalink
    Basically, I view nice suburbs as necessary evil to the best chance at the greatest growth.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2009
     permalink
    Lansing Township recovery bonds approval expected

    I think its good that they were able to have money for this project and the Accident Fund ramp. Eastwood is certainly developing into a very nice area and it will offer an impressive gateway into Lansing for those coming from the north.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     permalink
    Eastwood-area project could vie for federal stimulus money

    This is detailing Lansing Townships renewed plans for those development bonds freed up by Accident Fund.