The more I think about it the more excited I get about having a light rail or streetcar system connecting downtown Lansing with downtown East Lansing. These two cities really compliment eachother so well and if they could be more integrated the results would be incredible. Lansing has the advantage with adults and young professionals and East Lansing has the advantage when it comes to young adults, higher education and disposable income.
In my mind the track could be reduced to 4.0 miles if you had one end at the proposed East Village site (Bogue and Grand River) in East Lansing and the other end located at the Convention Center in downtown Lansing with 7 stops in total (Convention Center, Sparrow Hospital, Eastside Lansing near The Green Door, Frandor, Brody Complex at Harrison Road, downtown EL near MAC/Abbot, and East Village).
Do you think it'd be successful as far as ridership levels? What about from a return on investment perspective?
I'm pretty sure it would be successful. And I would say that a light rail line (or similar type transit) between Downtown EL and Downtown Lansing is inevitable, it's just a matter of when. Although I would say it should start at the CATA station and do the Capitol/Lenewee/Grand loop then continue down Michigan. Where is the MSU transit center at? That would seem to be a logical turn around point, except I don't know if it's close enough to Grand River.
Given the relatively small population of the urban and metro area, it would have to be much more heavily subsidized than lines in larger cities, most likely. I'm a fan of light rail, but with my limited knowledge, albeit, I'd guess that we'd have to see quite a bit more ridership on Route 1 (and, it seems to be materializing) to justify a full-scale ligh rail line. I could see something like a touristy trolly line definitely working, right now. I'm more skeptical about the success of a more serious commuter line at this point in time.
I agree that the Grand River to Michigan Ave corridor holds the best potential for improved and enhanced CATA service, but I'm not sure the capital costs of building light rail infrastructure would be justified. Bus Rapid Transit or some variety of a streetcar would, I think, make more sense -- either would require significant;y less start up costs with the same possible increase in service/ridership levels.
(Even an express bus during rush hours that made fewer stops between Meridian Mall and the Capitol would be a nice improvement over the short-term.)
This topic has been coming up more and more in local circles. Any service improvements, however, will hit the back burner for who-knows-how-long if the CATA millage fails. Get out on November 4th and vote "yes".
Once the millage is secured it is my understanding that CATA needs one of those infamous "earmarks" to pull together the planning funding to do a bona-fide feasibility study of the corridor.
MSU's transit center is located in the middle of campus near Shaw and Farm Lane. Later on if a route ever went through campus down Shaw Lane from Harrison to Hagadorn it could tie into the transit center pretty easily, but I think that it would be tough to do it initially with a connection off of Grand River.
It's true that we are on the smaller end as far as population goes (2007 MSA estimate at 456,000 - Lansing city at 120,000/EL city at 50,000/MSU students at 45,000). I know it's not a perfect comparison, but if Boise Idaho with an MSA estimate of 550,000 and a city population of 200,000 can implement a modern streetcar system I think we could as well. FYI, their proposed system is about 3 miles and is expected to cost about $55 million.
Does anyone know in general how feasibility studies are conducted? Is there a magic number that needs to be hit for vehicle traffic count or bus ridership numbers?
I am certainly no expert, but I believe the FTA website covers most of it. I don't think it's just about a magic number, but how you rate compared to other projects across the nation applying for the same pot of funding. But again, I have a limited understanding of the FTA process.
And Grand Rapids is also close to getting some sort of system, their metro size is closer to 750,000, but their ridership levels are significantly lower than CATA's. And as far as I know they don't have a specific route that sticks out among the rest as being very busy, like route 1 does here.
E. Lansing sounds like they're on board for light rail. That's a good thing...it's been nice hearing all the regional cooperation lately, with that things can really start happening with regional cooperation. Things like light rail will ONLY work with this kind of partnership.
I didn't think this was worth its own thread at this point, so a rail thread I thought was best for now. They are looking into a high speed rail service between Lansing, Detroit and Ann Arbor. It would incorporate distribution systems for hydrogen gas and fiber optics. It's not mentioned here, but it seems an obvious next step would be Lansing to Grand Rapids. Not sure how this would impact Lansing's airport, but it's definitely good they're getting serive to NY and DC.
Yeah, the company is dubious (they tried to offer a mass transit system to Detroit based on the technology) and many call them bogus out-right, but it's good to see bi-partisan support for studying all of these new options. The idea of Lansing-to-Detroit high-speed rail has been around since Hollister, and I believe it even got beyond the study stage. That means that all someone has to do is come up with a viable plan and it could start being built rather soon.
BTW, to link the articles, use the button/option second from the right.
Grand River and Michigan Avenue Corridor is the best place for a rail outside of Detroit. The Cata #1 route would be the best candidate in the State. If they do a study and find that a rail would be to expensive to install or that it would interfer with traffic to much, they might want to study Dayton Ohios Trolley Buses. Trolley buses are fast, green, and they could be a good alternative to a streetcar. If installing tracks and tearing up the streets is unacceptable then a trolley wire with a trolley bus would do the job. If you have the trolley lines up, the number 1 could run as it is because that route has large steady ridership.
Hopefully, they would run it from 5:00am until 2:00am seven days a week. If they did that you would develop dependency in the corridor. That area is ripe to run like New York or Chicago.
GR > Lansing > A2 > Detroit light rail has been bandied about for years re: SEMCOG, etc. It's great to see a discussion of light rail in this area but economic woes and Big Three influence will keep these plans in the fantasy department.
Huh? Detroit actually has two competing light rail proposals both very much on schedule to be built. In fact, DDOT is in the environmental study phase (to begin construction sometime next year) and the privately-funded one could get started this year. Perhaps, you haven't been following them too closely.
Rogers officially requested $110 million in the new transportation bill to "to plan and build a major public transportation route between downtown Lansing and the Meridian Mall." If this goes through it will be interesting to see what directon this takes.
I saw that, and was intrigued. They never exactly identify what they mean by it. I also hope that we get the money to buy the 66 new buses, or whatever they said.
I'm sure the major transportation system would be BRT or light rail. I hope this goes through, if he can't get the full $110m hopefully he focuses on that new transit line instead of buses.
1.) When I saw the proposal for a solar/hydrogen powered rail line to Detroit, I wondered why they would propose such a pie-in-the-sky plan. We'd really be fine with a diesel or an overhead-wire electric train like the Acela train in the Northeast. I'm sure a system like that would be much cheaper.
2.) Ironically, Lansing had a very extensive streetcar system before World War II. The Westside and Genesee neighborhoods grew out of that network. The small clusters of storefronts along Saginaw stand where the streetcar stops used to be. You could pick up some groceries as you stepped of the streetcar and walked a few blocks to your home.
The streetcar system also connected to a larger, statewide interurban network that took you to every other major city, like Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Jackson, and Ann Arbor/Detroit.
Just last year when the city was doing construction on Washington Ave, they found the old streetcar rails buried under the pavement. Of course, the rails got in the way of repaving the road, so they tore them out.
I don't think MagLev is pie in the sky, sure it is in it's infancy, but it is the technology of the future. I say if they can get it financed thats awesome for the state, we could be leading the country in transportation technology once again. I was actually suprised at how serious their taking it, I hope it pans out even if it is a long-shot.
I think the plan is dubious, at best (there website is, and has always been, a complete joke, which really raises questions about their seriousness). But, if it's not going to cost us anything, I don't see why we shouldn't give them the easements to test it out. BTW, it's not a Mag-Lev. It's a whole different technology.
BTW, speaking of the old streetcar system, does anyone know where I can find a map of it? I used to have a very small map I found somewhere on the web, but don't have it anymore.