Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2009
     permalink
    No, it's a MagLev system that their proposing, that's what ITC has always proposed.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeSep 17th 2009
     permalink
    Someone over on UP posted a link to this site:
    Michigan Avenue to Grand River Avenue Transportation Study
  1.  permalink
    Just a heads up but the Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study is nearing its end, and passed a significant milestone back on the 24th of last month when the options that made the cut were Bus Rapid Transit, Light Rail, and Modern Streetcar. This is really a big deal that these made the cut for further study. The study is to wrap up this summer.

    Go to the website and check out the study, so far.
    • CommentAuthorJManzella
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2010
     permalink
    Route 1 had more than 1.7 million riders in 2009. On a given weekday, it carries more than 10% of the trips along the corridor with less than 1% of the vehicles. It is 10-15 minutes between each bus, and it has 7-day service from early AM to late at night (depends on the day).

    There's plenty to be excited about, and much more to learn about! Visit http://www.migrtrans.org/resourcepage.html to see all of the completed documents, and follow along with daily updates at www.facebook.com/TransportationStudy
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2010
     permalink
    Welcome JManzella! I'm assuming you're involved in the transportation study somehow?
    • CommentAuthorJManzella
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2010 edited
     permalink
    It's my baby!! I'm the system planner for CATA and one of the assistant project managers on the study. Now that I've discovered this, i'll post updates as they come.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2010
     permalink
    Its good to have someone "in the know"here. We'll appreciate the updates.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJared
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2010
     permalink
    Hey JManzella,

    Welcome to the website. I heard that CATA has sold their trolleys. Does this mean that Entertainment Express is being re-purposed? Or have newer trolleys (or buses) been purchased to replace these?

    Also, have you been working/living in the Lansing area for a while or are you new to the area? It's always great to get more voices in the discussions here.
    • CommentAuthorJManzella
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
     permalink
    Hey Jared,

    I moved to Lansing via East Lansing about 2 years ago when I started working for CATA, I absolutely love this town. Great people, great things going on!

    As far as the trolley, those old ones needed to go... They were made in 1993, you're usually lucky to get 8-12 years out of a "medium duty" bus, which trolleys are categorized as. We bought new ones to replace the old ones, they were delivered a few months ago and we ran them for a bit before selling the old ones. The new ones are a lot more reliable, quieter, and a more comfortable ride.

    Trolleys are actually used for more than the Entertainment Express. During the day they are used in the Holt/Delhi area for demand response service and Route 19 (or they used to be on rt 19, we may have upped it to a full-size bus). Our executive office looooves those trolleys, so expect to see them around for a while!
    •  
      CommentAuthorJared
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
     permalink
    Thanks! I think that the trolleys offer a nice niche ride and probably attract people who wouldn't normally ride the bus. I'm glad to hear nothings changing with Entertainment Express.
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2010
     permalink
    Is there any data available about the ridership for the Entertainment Express?
  2.  permalink
    JManzella,

    I looked over some of the online documents you linked, and the reports/study look very promising! Correct me if I am wrong, but it looks like the options for improvement (as opposed to keeping things the way they are with bus service only) have been narrowed down to BRT, LRT and Modern Streetcar. It also seems that from the data and public input that the most desired/feasible upgrade would be towards a center-aligned modern streetcar with a minimum of 4 auto lanes to maintain an acceptable LOS. Is this what CATA/Lansing will likely be pursuing?

    Also, there is a section of Grand River between Bogue and River Street that has a very narrow ROW. How will the plan work in that stretch, or can some additional ROW be acquired?
    • CommentAuthorJManzella
    • CommentTimeMay 10th 2010 edited
     permalink
    in terms of likelihood, we're still workin on that! this portion of the study is to guage which of those options - the conventional bus, brt, lrt, and streetcar - are the most viable for federal funding and thus viable for implementation. Thus far (and his may change) the analysis has shown a need for 2 auto lanes in either direction throughout the corridor. We've also decided that center-running is probably going to work best through the corridor. We've just wrapped up a preliminary stage of creating service plans - once those are finished up, we'll move forward with comparing them and analyzing the results.

    All of the remaining alternatives are run through a computer model which is scrutinized by the FTA. This is the same model Tri-County uses for transportation planning, but it will be fine-tuned for transit.

    In terms of the actual engineering, there are plenty of hurdles to overcome but none of them are large enough to eliminate any of these options at this early point. This phase of the study will only bring us to a "2%" engineering level. In addition to ROW issues, there's other complications associated with the railroad downtown and the rail bridge in Meridian. Merciless pun: we'll cross those bridges when we come to them.

    I'm not yet sure of how the ROW issue will be dealt with, or whether it will be an issue at all - It's so preliminary that we haven't gotten there yet. I've been telling people that we are "in the clouds" still. In the next few months, this portion of the study will end with a decision of whether to descend to the "trees" or not. The ROW and bridge issues will get vetted as we go through "the weeds" in the next few years.

    It's going to be a long, deliberative process but one that holds great potential for our region!
    • CommentAuthorJManzella
    • CommentTimeMay 10th 2010
     permalink
    Full disclosure - I've recently accepted a new position at LEAP as the Regional Business Program Manager... Helluva job opportunity just opened up at CATA! http://www.cata.org/AboutCATA/JobOpportunities/tabid/154/ctl/JobView/mid/592/Default.aspx?JobId=50

    Sorry to kill your inside source! I hope it was good while it lasted...
    • CommentAuthorhood
    • CommentTimeMay 10th 2010
     permalink
    What exactly does LEAP do?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJared
    • CommentTimeMay 10th 2010
     permalink
    From their website:
    Leap is an innovative private/public partnership that's been working since 2007 to position the Greater Lansing region to win new jobs and new investment in this competitive global market. We're a one-stop shop offering direct access to mid-Michigan's myriad resources.